Morning folks ;-) On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Andre Klapper<ak...@gmx.net> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 22.07.2009, 14:21 -0400 schrieb Tristan Van Berkom: >> On the other hand, its possible we could do better tracking this stuff, >> is there a l.g.o. page that I can visit that shows me what are the blocker >> bugs in the platform for any given supported system ? > > bugzilla.gnome.org provides a "portability" keyword and you can set the > severity of a bug. I don't think that a wikipage is needed. > If people use these bugzilla options is another question though...
Maybe a query into the GNOME bugzilla database will give me the impression that GNOME is taking care of my issues on my system "foo", Maybe the same bugzilla query could be useful to me as a developer`s roadmap to addressing problems on system "foo", but I doubt it. On the other hand people do file these bugs, so there is evidence that people do care about the bugs - and somebody might even be interested in volunteering to track them; so that we could have a report of the status of the platform on a given system, it might even be useful for us maintainers to have a clearer picture of what is going on with our code when distributed in the real world. Usually in the past Ive had time to go over the buglist before release time and nail all the blockers I can, this hasnt been the case this year, and really as far as I am concerned as a maintainer, its really pretty and nice to set patch status and stuff like that, but a bug is unconfirmed until its resolved - thats the summit of interaction with bugzilla I can realistically afford. Cheers, -Tristan _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list