Le mardi 10 novembre 2009 à 10:56 +0000, Bastien Nocera a écrit : > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:28 +0100, Xavier Claessens wrote: > > Le mardi 10 novembre 2009 à 10:19 +0000, Thomas Wood a écrit : > > > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 10:18 +0100, Xavier Claessens wrote: > > > > So if you agree/disagree with those changes, please tell your opinion! > > > > I would like to know if I'm the only one to be worried. > > > > > > Well, I'll repeat what I said on the bug: > > > > > > I agree with McCann, if someone wants to tweak their settings in such a > > > way, then it should be done through an appropriate "tweaks" application. > > > The interface tab does not contain options that are of interest to the > > > majority of users. > > > > Can you please tell me what's gnome-appearance-properties if it is not > > to tweak the appearance of the GNOME desktop? > > > > The fact that those options are useless for the majority of users is > > highly debatable and should definitely not depend on you+McCann alone. I > > would like wider acceptance before. > > > > I definitely give a -1, but if I'm alone then ignore me ;) > > You're confusing this place for a democracy :) > > We might as well enable Bugzilla voting otherwise. > > The reasons behind the move have been documented, and explanations given > on how to get the icons back.
Actually I started this thread because starting from today, GNOME does not have any way to get icons back anymore. gconf-editor is not considered a "tweak application" ;-) _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list