Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 18.14 -0400, David Zeuthen ha scritto: > > So? Why this should be a failure? >
> Because the premise of System Settings in GNOME 3 is, > surprisingly, to change your system settings or personalize the > experience. So, are there no system settings or personalizations other then the ones provided by GNOME? 6.x billions of people and only ten (or so) settings panel? > We should strive to make this as easy as possible and having 20 > panels such as "Java Settings" or "HTTPD Control" or even "Firewall" > is something that gets in the way. So if we allowed 3rd party panels, > it would be a failure because trusting that people won't write broken > panels like the ones mentioned above is, unfortunately, very naive. Wait: first, it's GNOME3, not GNOME2, you can't provide a new panel simply adding a .desktop file with proper keys. You have to develop it using proper API. This is a first barrier for broken stuff. Second: are we a censorship? are we fighting against the ugly? are all non-gnome developers odd and stupid? It seems your starting point is: everybody's wrong, but not GNOME people. I feel it really offensive and counterproductive for GNOME project itself. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list