On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Claudio Saavedra <csaave...@gnome.org> wrote: > Actually the dependence on NM is quite soft. We could just depend on > the NM service being there and if it's not just not use it. For a > bunch of macros that we use and theoretically shouldn't change often > we don't need to have a compile-time dependency on NM.
Since in this case it was pretty easy to get rid of the compile-time dependency I just did that (by judiciously re-defining two #defines and one enum in Epiphany). We still assume NM is on the other side of DBus though. If it's not things won't work, but I guess that's not much worse than it used to be. Xan _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list