Javier Jardón <jjar...@gnome.org> wrote: > On 28 February 2013 08:26, Dan Winship <d...@gnome.org> wrote: >> >> But it seems like it would be a good idea to start explicitly noting >> planned future ABI breaks in some way, somewhere, so nothing gets >> forgotten when it does come, and so people can see the big picture more >> easily. > > In GTK+ this is done by marking bugs with 4.0 as target milestore [1]
We should also be tracking and targeting any gjs binding issues. We really need the new applications to be clearing the way for those who want to follow, rather than working around deficiencies in the platform. One issue I know of is the lack of introspection support in libcanberra [1]. I bet there are others... Allan [1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32587 -- IRC: aday on irc.gnome.org Blog: http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
