On 24 April 2013 02:14, Florian Müllner <fmuell...@gnome.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Marco Scannadinari
> <ma...@scannadinari.co.uk> wrote:
>



>  > I think your suggestion of a "feature" branch can be a worthy
> compromise, though.
>
> Except that Bastien is right - while on a branch, a feature will
> hardly be tested by anyone than other core developers of the same
> module. It's unfortunate, but "real" users generally only get to test
> a new feature once it appears in their distro (read: some time after
> the feature appears in a stable GNOME release).
>

A branch can be packaged as well.

So one module could have two packages.
One with "mature" UI changes.
One with "controversial" edge UI to be tested.

The edge package is to be installed by default.

Still the user would have the possibility to get it replaced by the other
one.


This is basically making sure that we can downgrade/upgrade between two
module releases,
which is basically not insured for a module from two GNOME releases.
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to