2 mai 2017 17:30 "Bastien Nocera" <had...@hadess.net> a écrit:
> Hey, > > On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 12:54 +0000, jfle...@gmail.com wrote: > >> First of all, I want to thank you all for your comments and >> feedbacks. I wasn't really expecting such a nice welcome :-) >> >> Regarding the HIG, you can actually also thank Mathieu Jourdan ( http >> s://github.com/mjourdan ). He has been providing me with awesome >> mockups. >> >> Regarding the goals, I think we can agree it would be best to keep >> Gnome documents, simple-scan and Paperwork separated, at least for >> now: >> >> - Simple-scan: For me, the way I see it, it's more of a general scan >> application. It can do wonder, but my understanding is that it's not >> intended as a document manager. For instance, I used it to scan this >> drawing : https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/135331/22778343 >> e449f9c2-eeb6-11e6-9edc-ece6f372d147.png . Scanning it with Gnome >> Documents or Paperwork wouldn't have make sense. >> - Gnome Documents: Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems mostly >> focused at electronics documents (.odt, .pdf, etc). >> - Paperwork: As stated previously, it has a very clear focus on paper >> documents. PDFs are mostly a side-effect so people don't have to >> switch between document managers all the time. It's also intended to >> let the users do as little as possible .. and some people just don't >> want that (I got a bunch of tickets over time regarding putting >> titles on documents ...). So, while its goal may overlap Gnome >> Documents, I don't think one size fits all here. > > If I could give you a piece of advice, it would be to try and share the > maximum amount of code with simple-scan and what would become the > GNOME-ified version of it. That is, start by hacking on simple-scan for > all the "simpler" stuff, making sure to split off the bits you want to > reuse, like the scanning, calibrating, and cropping UI, the OCR > support, and the system-wide configuration, if that happens. > It makes sense. Since simple-scan is written in vala/C and Paperwork in Python 3, I guess any common ground would have to be written in C/GObject. It's going to take time ... Not sure if I will ever enough free time to do everything I would like to :-) > In the longer term, that would mean that you would get more people > working on this portion of the code, so more eyeballs, maintenance, and > features "for free" for your application. I could also see this part as > very interesting to integrate into other GNOME-ish applications, such > as the GIMP, or Inkscape, in the longer term. > > OCRFeeder is also another project that you could be interested in > looking at, it's an OCR application for GNOME, though it's not in the > "highly maintained" category. > > Cheers _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
