If you read my email fully and clicked the links, you would have seen the
specific date the rebase before merge is coming to our instance.

I'm surprised that copy&pasting a comment and clicking the button "quote"
vs pressing a button should be considered a blocker for migrating more
projects. If that's the level of details we should block this for moving
on, where everyone of us (included me) has its own detail that wants to be
improved, I'm confident we would never move to anything.

So please, take into consideration the big picture.

Said that, add your comments about specific improvements to issue #8 too in
a new comment so we can track them.

On Thu., 7 Dec. 2017, 18:52 Florian Müllner, <fmuell...@gnome.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org>
> wrote:
> > I'll add two more to Milan's list:
> >
> > (1) Canned replies. I would rather stay with Bugzilla forever than give
> up
> > canned replies.
>
> That is being tracked:
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME-Community/GitLab-Infrastructure/issues/33
>
> There are some links to upstream discussions there, so I'd expect some
> comparable functionality in gitlab eventually.
>
>
> > (2) Still waiting for rebase merge requests. Ditto.
>
> And this actually *has* been considered a blocker the entire time. So
> seeing the migration going forward, I suspect that there has been
> movement in that area ...
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to