Folks, I don't have anything technical to add to this discussion, so as someone just following along with the thread I think we should take our emotions down a couple notches. Calling each other out, playing the blame game, and dredging up stuff from the past is not going to help us come up with a clear path forward.
We're all friends and colleagues, let's not forget that first and foremost. :-) On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 10:26 PM Debarshi Ray <rishi...@lostca.se> wrote: > Jeremy, > > You already attempted to slander me once before in this thread: > > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-January/msg00027.html > > It's been one week since I produced evidence against that: > > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-January/msg00035.html > > You had enough time to clarify your original statement or recant it. I > no longer consider anything you say to be in good faith. > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 03:21:57PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > But you're talking about removing even more online accounts providers > > even though apps that support them have not yet implemented a > > replacement. > > Nice reversal of cause and effect there. Good job. > > The decision to retire GNOME Documents was the reason the integration > point was dropped from GOA. > > > Interestingly, Ubuntu Online Accounts was ahead of its time here. What > > it offers in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS sort of foreshadows how this could work. > > Oh, yeah, Ubuntu Online Accounts - the purveyor of shady downstream > patches against applications (read: Shotwell) that replace upstream > branding and reward with crashes. > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list >
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
