Thank you, Christopher! I will post the original message on discourse now.

________________________________
From: Christopher Davis <christopherda...@gnome.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 10:27 AM
To: S . <salma...@live.com>
Cc: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org <desktop-devel-list@gnome.org>
Subject: Re: Chrome Remote Desktop Support for GNOME/Wayland

Hello Salman,

You might want to share this on the GNOME Discourse. Generally the community 
has moved away from mailing lists, and instead questions like these are posted 
to Discourse. This has the benefit of being easier to use and preserving 
conversation history in a nicer format.

Our Discourse instance is hosted at https://discourse.gnome.org/

Regards,
Christopher Davis

On Tue, Jan 25 2022 at 04:30:26 PM +0000, S . via desktop-devel-list 
<desktop-devel-list@gnome.org> wrote:
Hi All,

(Please feel free to advise of appropriate mailing list if you think this 
doesn't fit here)

I am looking into supporting CRD for GNOME/wayland. CRD would be leveraging 
remote desktop APIs (along with screencast) as exposed by 
xdg-desktop-portal{,-gnome}. While experimenting with remote desktop APIs, I 
see that for enhanced security, an interactive dialog (relevant code: 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/xdg-desktop-portal-gnome/-/blob/main/src/screencast.c#L345-349)
 is always presented to the user to select sources/devices they want to allow 
to be remote controlled. Though this workflow would make perfect sense when a 
user is directly connected to the machine and is allowing someone remote to 
take control (e.g. to get help from IT) but it is less than ideal for a user 
who is trying to access their own machine remotely (e.g. accessing their work 
computer from home).

I would like to hear ideas from the GNOME community about how to best support 
the latter use case for remote desktop. Is there a secure way to bypass the 
dialog/prompt selectively for apps? There seems to be recent support for 
restoring the capture streams (if persistence was demanded previously by the 
user) using flatpak permission store: 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/xdg-desktop-portal-gnome/-/merge_requests/14 but 
remembering streams for remote desktop session is explicitly disallowed in the 
portal frontend 
(https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/blob/master/src/screen-cast.c#L589-L594
 -- though this doesn't seem to be GNOME specific). Is it reasonable to extend 
the stream restoration support to work for remote desktop sessions as well as 
pre-populating the permission store to allow remote desktop session (so that 
user intervention can be avoided)? Also, would pre-populating the permission 
store work for system installation of CRD or would only work for 
flatpak/sandboxed version of the app?

Looking at how other software/systems are supporting screen capture/remote 
desktop, we see wlroots/sway allows for configuring the output screen to 
capture in a config file 
(https://github.com/emersion/xdg-desktop-portal-wlr/blob/master/xdg-desktop-portal-wlr.5.scd#description).
 I believe Windows.Graphics.Capture APIs can also allow Win32 apps to capture a 
window/screen without user interaction.

Would love to hear thoughts from the community about the best way forward.

Thanks,
Salman


_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to