David Crossley wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>>David Crossley wrote:
>>
>>>I revised the list, taking the replies into account
>>>and adding some new queries.
>>>
>>>>- agree the subset of XHTML2 to be used
>>>>and document that via example.
>>>
>>>See other thread.
>>>
>>>>- create DTD's
>>>
>>>Why do we need DTDs for use with internal structure?
>>
>>For using XHTML2 as an input format.
>
> For that part i did understand the need. If the xml instances
> declare them, then the parser needs to resolve them locally.
> Same with any document type.
>
> Of course there are no DTDs yet at Appendix F or G.
>
> However, we are discussing internal processing,
> and i was wondering what is the need for DTDs there.
> Is there any need?
No.
> Or am i misunderstanding something about XHTML2 and DTDs?
Not AFAIU.
>>In fact it will be a modularization
>>of XHTML2 via RelaxNG validation.
^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>- Decide how to make the pipeline process.
>>>>Now we have body-*.html and stuff, but a simpler process
>>>>should be devised.
...
> Do you mean keep the existing pipelines and
> starting this new one so that old and new can
> work side-by-side until the new stuff is ready.
Correct.
No need for a separate branch means easier involvment.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
