according to the codes we only have 3 of these properties.
private static final String SHA1_PROPERTY = "sha1";
private static final String CHANGELIST_PROPERTY = "changelist";
private static final String REVISION_PROPERTY = "revision";
should we add a new set of them (likely a prefix like ci_friendly_* )
----------
the reason I want it is I have several repos who both inherited from a pom
of a version, and use a same version number elsewhere.
for example
we have
<parent>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-parent</artifactId>
<version>3.5.6</version>
<relativePath></relativePath>
</parent>
and same time
<properties>
<java.version>21</java.version>
<springboot.version>3.5.6</springboot.version>
<revision>0.0.1</revision>
<native.maven.plugin.version>0.11.0</native.maven.plugin.version>
<graalpy.version>25.0.0</graalpy.version>
<antlr.version>3.5.3</antlr.version>
<antlr4.version>4.13.2</antlr4.version>
<antlr4-c3.version>1.2.0x</antlr4-c3.version>
<grpc.version>1.76.0</grpc.version>
<protobuf.version>4.32.1</protobuf.version>
<project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
<gop-root>${maven.multiModuleProjectDirectory}</gop-root>
<maven.compiler.proc>full</maven.compiler.proc>
<surefire-report-phase>prepare-package</surefire-report-phase>
<os-maven-plugin.version>1.7.1</os-maven-plugin.version>
<protobuf-maven-plugin.version>0.6.1</protobuf-maven-plugin.version>
<replacer.version>1.5.3</replacer.version>
</properties>
and
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-oauth2-authorization-server</artifactId>
<version>${springboot.version}</version>
</dependency>
so seems it be better to let the version in parent use a same propertie
with the dependency.
so we have to use a ci friendly property
but we already use revision for the project version, and sha/changelist
seems not quite suitable
so maybe we shall add rule to make every of ci_friendly_* property be
ci_friendly property?
