I haven't been following this too closely, but I'm pretty sure this vote
doesn't really tackle the core issues. For example, if we were really
against the ability to specify a method in a url directly, we would
remove the method: prefix, which would break several of the tags.
I wonder if instead of voting on these little issues, we let several
people come up with comprehensive solutions and vote on that. For
example, I like a lot that I see in Patrick's Able project, and think it
should be considered in its entirety. At the same time, perhaps Jason
has a unified vision for how this whole process should work.
I just sense we are getting bogged down in little details and bickering
over them won't move us forward or even result in a half-way useful and
cohesive framework.
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
On 8/25/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And I'm all for those (or similar ideas). I think everyone is for
those, or at least one or the
other. The problem is for the current release. The one where people
don't want to wait for
those new features. The "!" syntax is still in that one, and the
question is whether it
should be on or off by default. I say off.
Just to clarify matters, I thought it would be helpful to elevate
Jason's post to a vote.
+1 for retaining the "!" idiom but disabling it by default.
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
