On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Jörg Knobloch <jo...@jorgk.com> wrote:
> I would like to hear a good argument why this confusing behaviour should > be maintained. I don't consider the following a good argument (quote): > "Believe me when I say that *every single time* we have tried to "fix" > something here, someone has told us that they actually want a different > behavior. As such, I think that any change here must be performed as a > larger project to fix our spell checking UI. Even fixing bugs in this code > has proved to cause more issues." > > I even have proof, that this is *not* a good argument, since one aspect of > the general spell checking problem (bug 717433) already has an accepted > solution. > I don't intend to pick a fight with Ehsan over this. I believe what he wrote there. The patch in bug 717433 just seemed like an especially clear improvement. Rob -- lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf toD selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t rdsme,aoreseoouoto o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr rdm or rnea lurpr .a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr esn _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
