On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Robert O'Callahan <rob...@ocallahan.org> > wrote: > > That's an option, but it's a very large problem that's very difficult to > > get right. And there are so many things that need to be plugged, it would > > make the feature very fragile: change the Web content in some subtle way > > and suddenly it looks wrong or disappears altogether for no apparent > reason. > > We could also go the other way. And have some kind of opt-in flag that > requires everything to be CORS-same-origin and doesn't allow :visited > and plugins or some such. And if you have that enabled you get to use > some new features. Might be easier than tracking on a per layout box > basis whether it violates some constraints. > Where would you put that flag? I think this has basically the same problems: very difficult to specify and police, and fragile when the content changes. Rob -- lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf toD selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t rdsme,aoreseoouoto o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr rdm or rnea lurpr .a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr esn _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
