we have 32 bit windows builds, are there specific concerns you have about
the perf impact of SSE2 and linux32 builds?

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Mike Hommey <m...@glandium.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 06:40:08PM -0700, jma...@mozilla.com wrote:
> > Our infrastructure at Mozilla does a great job of supporting all the
> > jobs we need to run jobs for the thousands of pushes we do each month.
> > Currently Talos runs on real hardware (and we have no plans to change
> > that), but it does mean that we have a limited pool of available
> > machines.  Right now this isn't a problem for Linux 32 or 64 since we
> > don't run any other jobs on those platforms.
> >
> > The problem we do have is on OSX and Windows, and in the last 2 weeks
> > we have had a big problem with backlog on Windows.  The main reason we
> > have a problem on OSX and Windows is because we run all the unit tests
> > on there as well.  Granted we have a larger pool of machines, but we
> > run a considerably larger volume of tests on there.
> >
> > Trying to be smart about what we are doing, bug 1204920 [1] was filed
> > to look into what would happen if we stopped running Talos on Linux32.
> > We would still have OSX, Windows, and Linux64 support and from looking
> > at all the data for the last 90 days, there are very few minor
> > differences between 32 and 64 when it comes to catching regressions.
> >
> > After looking into this, we realized that we could reimage the linux32
> > machines as windows machines- this would then solve our backlog and
> > give us some breathing room on capacity until we find other ways to
> > reduce the load or make a more formal decision to increase the machine
> > pool.
> >
> > Sadly there are really no plans to formally add back Linux32 support.
> > What does Linux32 give us that Linux64 doesn't when it comes to Talos
> > results?  I am looking at this from a narrow lens, quite possibly
> > someone else has ideas of what might be more useful.  Overall we are
> > serious about doing this, but want to do it knowing more so at what
> > cost.
> >
> > Thanks for reading and fixing Performance regressions when they show
> > up in your patches!
>
> And here we are, 8 months later, deciding to compile linux32 builds with
> SSE2, and no way to know what impact that has on performance...
>
> Mike
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to