Stefan

pushed the new cvs head into my project and did the required changes, all well here.

thx again, hope to have some time for the testing issue on my platform (and access to a linux as well to be able to
spot any difference)


thx again...

regards,
-marc=

Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Marc Portier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


1. ClasspathUtils duplicates (i.e. stole) some code from the
o.a.t.a.taskdefs.Definer: the least I should do is refactor that one
to now use what is in the ClasspathUtils.


This is now in CVS.

I noted at least one difference, and I'm not sure whether it is going
to have any effect right now, but we may need to address this: If no
classpath had been defined, Definer would first check the project's
"core loader" and use that if set.  ClasspathUtils ignores this.


While this is not that much of code I still would like to add to
this some Helper that does all of this for you,


It's also in.

BTW


public void setClasspathRef(Reference r) {
    this.cpHelper.setClasspathRef(r);
}


I wouldn't implement this and setClasspath(Path) at all if I were to
write a new task today.  I'd simply stick with the nested element.


(what about these ./proposal things?)


Ignore them for now.


I take it the prefered patch format is cvs -q diff -u -N ?


Yep.  The -q is your choice, off course.


tests are currently not working in cvs head


I think some of the failures you've seen are due to the "<copy>
changes the line-end style" bug that is supposed to be fixed now.  If
things keep failing, nag this list.  "ant test" is supposed to pass.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- Marc Portier http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog at http://radio.weblogs.com/0116284/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to