On Friday 25 April 2003 18:32, Erik Hatcher wrote: > On Friday, April 25, 2003, at 01:25 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: > > All I ask is to do the changes in the core separately. > > +1 > +1 > I'm in agreement with you on the order of events, Costin, 100%. > <antlib> with tasks/datatypes is fair game to migrate into HEAD, then
with xml or with properties? > core changes to make the other components work as pluggable pieces, > then refactoring <antlib> to support it. > +1 > I also agree with the use of interfaces (not just marker ones, per se) > for distinguishing what components are used for. Again, its cool that > Ant supports making lightweight tasks, but I think it should be more > rigid in the future and mandating components implement a particular > interface. Most of us at least extend Task when writing tasks, I > suspect, too. :) +1 Peter