I know that Canoo WebTest uses %{x} as its own variable substitution. > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 12:50 PM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: RE: [VOTE] macrodef - do attributes as properties or > substitutions > > > Another non committer here. > I don't like $(x) because it looks too much like ${x}, although I > suppose I could get used to that. Therfore, I am drawn to > @{x}. ${attribute:x} is possible but way too much typing for > my taste. > Abbreviated to ${att:x} or ${attrib:x} my negativity level goes down > accordingly. > > Before "voting", though, could someone list all the conflicting usages > with other systems that ant must interface with. > > -----Original Message----- > From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 12:10 PM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] macrodef - do attributes as properties or > substitutions > > > OK, how do we want to implement <macrodef> attributes: > current > [ ] as textual substitution ~ 4 > [ ] as "real" Ant properties ~ 2 > > undecided ~ 1 > > If macrodef attribute are to be implements as substitutions, > what should > be the notation? (where x is the attribute name) > > [ ] as ${x} (look like ant properties) > [ ] as $(x) > [ ] as @x > [ ] as ${attribute:x} > [ ] as @{x} > [ ] some thing else > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]