Martijn Kruithof wrote:
I think we should consult the user list first (so far no reactions on
a open question regarding icontract though).
Martijn
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hello,
I think of starting a vote soon (or maybe better 4 votes) on the removal
of the classes depending upon xslp, icontract, vaj, testlet.
Remarks, critics and suggestions about :
- whether this should happen at all,
- in terms of bylaws, would such a vote be considered a code change with
lazy approval/lazy consensus, or like adoption of a new codebase meaning
requiring 2/3 majority ?
- how to word the vote emails,
- ...
are welcome.
I think that we should be careful as there might be a few old build
files that still use these *extremely* dated tools (vaj was superseded
by eclipse based tools over 6 years ago - wow, I'm old enough to
remember vaj erk!)
Since the jars aren't available for some of the classes, that limits the
number of new users, but we have no idea of how many old users are
reliant on these tools. Basically I'm scared of a compatibility problem
down the line. Still if users are dependent on these older jars, they
probably won't upgrade Ant to the very latest
Kev
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
