Why not simply <release version="1.5" date="2017-05-30"> ?That is the date the vote started and the binaries were built?Or perhaps you could add a few days to it and make sure the vote ends at that date?
It's just strange when reading the documentation of a released version to see that it's 'unreleased' or 'during-release'... Maarten Van: "Matèrne, Jan (RZF, Ref 410)" <jan.mate...@fv.nrw.de> Aan: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org> Verzonden: woensdag 31 mei 10:25 2017 Onderwerp: AW: [VOTE] Release Compress Antlib 1.5 based on RC1 Maybe <release version="1.5" date="during-release" vote-starts="2017-05-30">? Jan -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2017 09:46 An: dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Compress Antlib 1.5 based on RC1 On 2017-05-31, Maarten Coene wrote: > The changes.xml still contains the following line:<release version="1.5" > date="unreleased"> > I'm not sure this should block the release, but I think it would be better to > fill in the correct date. This is a chicken and egg problem. As long as the vote hasn't passed, I don't know the release date :-) Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org