Jakob Lechner wrote: > On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 19:13 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: >> Mathias Röllig wrote: >> > Sure? Perhaps, if the field can be protected against deletion. But IMHO >> > is this also only senseful if protected areas can be protected by >> > protecting the document with password like a calc document. >> >> Well, after some thinking I meanwhile believe that the few cases where a >> read-only field could make sense can be implemented differently. So I >> stand corrected. :-) > > In my case the content of the fields is provided by a C++ addon. If > certain values are displayed the user shall be allowed to modify the > field content, if some other values are displayed the user shouldn't be > allowed to change the content.
So in fact you have two field types mixed into one. It's more like an input field that is prefilled and sometimes shouldn't be modifiable. Perhaps you can implement it in this way: make it an input field and in case you don't want to have it editable replace it by something that isn't editable? Though all text fields that come to my mind are editable somehow (but at least not directly). Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
