Hi,
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> If you could check and see if those tests failed in 0.9.7 that would
> be interesting...
In regards to Solaris 9 and 0.9.8/0.9.7:
The exact same errors appear when testing 0.9.7 on Solaris 9.
There are only two real failures, I believe. The first one is in
testdir.c:test_rmkdir_nocwd(), which tries to rmdir(2) a
directory that it just changed to. Solaris doesn't like that and
returns EINVAL. The test case is then aborted, leaving the the
remaining test cases are likely confused. I didn't check them,
as removing the failing test case and rerunning makes most of the
other failures go away.
The second failure is in testsockets.c:sendto_receivefrom().
For some reason bind() is returning EADDRNOTAVAIL when
sendto_receivefrom() calls apr_socket_bind(sock, to). This is a
datagram socket that is supposed to bind to "::1" port 7772.
Below is the struct sockaddr's sin6 field before the address is
passed to bind():
sin6 = {
sin6_family = 26U
sin6_port = 7772U
sin6_flowinfo = 0
sin6_addr = {
_S6_un = {
_S6_u8 = ""
_S6_u32 = (0, 0, 0, 1)
__S6_align = 0
}
}
sin6_scope_id = 0
__sin6_src_id = 0
}
I don't really understand why it's not binding. I notice there
are no other UDP sockets using IPv6 on this machine; only TCP
sockets. That's a bit odd, as there's a big bunch of bound IPv4
UDP sockets and usually on other OS's both v6 and v4 sockets get
bound at the same time. (But I'm a Solaris newbie, so this might
just be one of those things, I guess.)
Regards,
Joonas
