On 2/10/06, D.J. Heap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/23/06, Andreas Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Garrett Rooney wrote: > > > > > > I'm not positive, not being an especially fluent win32 developer, but > > > I think this seems reasonable... Would this patch be a replacement > > > for the backport you previously identified as avoiding the problem, or > > > is it in addition to it? > > > > > > -garrett > > > > > > > Ah, no this patch is an addition to that backport, and I now realize > > that this patch ought to be nominated for backport if the intended > > behavior is to mimmick the *nix behavior of apr_stat(,,APR_FINFO_PROT,) > > > > /Andreas > > > > > I lost track of where this issue is at...have these fixes been applied > so that on Win32 Subversion should work with the latest apr?
Unfortunately no, this (along with the proposed backport of that other revision, IIRC) has not yet been committed. I haven't had a chance to dig into it, and nobody with any win32-fu has looked at this AFAIK. -garrett
