On Wednesday 22 February 2006 02:03, Bojan Smojver wrote: > Quoting Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > +APU_DECLARE(const char*) apr_dbd_get_name(const apr_dbd_driver_t > > *driver, + apr_dbd_results_t > > *res, int col); > > I'm having a feeling (after doing a bit of testing on this) that we > should also include a pool in the list of arguments here.
If a pool is needed, it should be simple enough to make it a member of the apr_dbd_results_t struct. But since get_row at the same level of the API has a pool argument, I agree your proposal looks like the best solution. Thanks:-) -- Nick Kew
