Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > > Looking at the test, I think we should have two tests, one for IPv6 > and one for IPv4. Run them both, allow the IPv6 one to fail (if the > module is not loaded or whatever). Does that seem acceptable to > people ? I volunteer to help make the changes anyway, the current > state is a mess :-)
+1 - that sounds like a great solution. Do you want me to hold off on the 1.2.10 tag for a day or two to slip this in, now that we know what the case is? Or is there a simpler short term solution to let us get together a solid 1.2.10 for httpd-2.2.5 and others who need a release sooner rather than later? Bill