On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 16:26 +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > This sounds like a valid point.
+1 > I would propose to revert r817810 / r817809 (for 1.3.x / 1.4.x) and > only keep r817806 (trunk). Graham? > IMHO we can backport this again later if the problem is sorted out in > trunk. I think we should revert this even in trunk for now, because it completely changes how hashes work. A hash allocated from a pool must keep things in valid memory until all cleanups finish running for that pool. -- Bojan
