On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 18:06 -0500, Bob Rossi wrote: > If you are bent on preserving this interface, does a new interface > make sense, that allows the user to pass in the parameters, > without passing in addresses?
Nobody is bent on anything, although there were reasons to do it this way (search the list - I cannot remember all the detauls). This is what it is in 1.x, due to our versioning rules. Design your own and drop it into 2.0. -- Bojan
