On 2/5/2010 10:25 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >> I noticed this when reviewing the 1.3.10 tarballs (still on my >> machine). Should I retag 1.3.10 to avoid potential user confusion? > > or just skip 1.3.10 and call it 1.3.11; I don't care either way > > (If I hadn't sat back so long watching Bill crank these suckers out > I'd be done. Thanks, Bill!)
A PITA, huh? :) I would suggest simply rerolling with this change; "No C sources were harmed in the creation of this tarball". But that's just my 2c, others might disagree.
