>From a community perspective a supported release every 6 months would be much more attractive than yearly, as having to wait ~9-10 months for something like SASI is kind of frustrating.
Monthly dev releases is awesome. On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:18 PM Nate McCall <zznat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I’m not sure it makes sense to have separate features/stability releases > in that world. 4.0.x will be stable, every 4.x will be a dev release on the > road to 5.0. > > > +1. Much easier to understand and it's 'backwards compatible' (sort > of) with wherever we leave 3.x. > > Still keeping 4.x on monthly cadence should keep the small, incremental > focus. >