>From a community perspective a supported release every 6 months would be
much more attractive than yearly, as having to wait ~9-10 months for
something like SASI is kind of frustrating.

Monthly dev releases is awesome.

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:18 PM Nate McCall <zznat...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I’m not sure it makes sense to have separate features/stability releases
> in that world. 4.0.x will be stable, every 4.x will be a dev release on the
> road to 5.0.
> >
> +1. Much easier to understand and it's 'backwards compatible' (sort
> of) with wherever we leave 3.x.
>
> Still keeping 4.x on monthly cadence should keep the small, incremental
> focus.
>

Reply via email to