In my opinion, stabilising MVs would count towards bug fixing, to totally acceptable for the 3.11.X line. No conflict here.
-- AY On 13 January 2017 at 17:56:06, Jonathan Haddad (j...@jonhaddad.com) wrote: +1 (non binding) to feature freeze. I also like the idea of stabilizing MVs. Ben, you've probably been the most vocal about the issues, have you made any progress towards making them work any better during bootstrap / etc? Any idea of fixing them is a major undertaking? Jon On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:39 AM Benjamin Roth <benjamin.r...@jaumo.com> wrote: +1 also I appreciate any effort on MV stability. It is an official 3.x feature but not production ready for the masses. Am 13.01.2017 18:34 schrieb "Jonathan Ellis" <jbel...@gmail.com>: > +1 > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Aleksey Yeschenko <alek...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi all! > > > > It seems like we have a general consensus on ending tick-tock at 3.11, > and > > moving > > on to stabilisation-only for 3.11.x series. > > > > In light of this, I suggest immediate feature freeze in the 3.X branch. > > > > Meaning that only bug fixes go to the 3.11/3.X branch from now on. > > > > All new features that haven’t be committed yet should go to trunk only > > (4.0), if the vote passes. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > AY > > > > > -- > Jonathan Ellis > co-founder, http://www.datastax.com > @spyced >
