Do we need to moderate heavily from the get-go, or should we implement all
this after a couple of trial calls to see how bad things are?

On Sat, 10 Aug 2019, 08:27 Scott Andreas, <sc...@paradoxica.net> wrote:

> On the "virtual" side --
>
> I've spent some time this week reviewing how the Kubernetes community
> conducts their weekly meetings. References are at the end of this message.
>
> If we'd like to hold occasional virtual meetings among the dev and user
> community, here are some things that may help make them successful:
>
> 1. Agenda: Discussed and committed on the dev list in advance, published
> on Confluence, with speakers confirmed and topic durations assigned.
> 2. Video Call: To be dialed into by confirmed speakers, eliminating the
> need for heavy WebEx-style moderation, several minutes of "please mute,
> everyone mute...," or difficulty enforcing ASF code of conduct if someone
> joins an open call in bad faith. Google Meet appears to be free for up to
> 25 participating / presenting in a call.
> 3. Live stream / broadcast: Google Meet meetings can also be broadcast
> live to YouTube and recorded for non-participating attendees to watch
> (e.g., via EveryCord now that Hangouts on Air is discontinued). This would
> enable a model in which a smaller number of speakers could present, with
> anyone in the community able to join and watch live or at a later time.
> 4. Moderation: An emcee to introduce the agenda, hold speakers to time to
> ensure discussion on one item doesn't prevent the rest from being reached,
> and represent community Q&A.
> 5. Community Q&A: We could conduct Q&A with community members via ASF
> Slack during the call – e.g., a moderator reading questions shared via
> Slack, answered by presenters. Text-based Q&A also mitigates the risk of
> runaway "not really a question but more of a comment..." dialogue.
> 6. Notes: As others mentioned, notes should be prepared (live or after the
> fact) and archived on Confluence alongside the agenda.
> 7. Decisions: Happen on the dev list, though discussion and
> consensus-building may occur during calls like this.
>
> Hosting / moderating calls like this takes planning and effort, but it
> seems very doable if others feel it would be valuable to our dev and user
> community. Happy to help if so.
>
> – Scott
>
> ---
>
> References:
> [1] Meeting doc:
> https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/events/community-meeting.md
> [2] Agenda:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VQDIAB0OqiSjIHI8AWMvSdceWhnz56jNpZrLs6o7NJY/edit#heading=h.en8cy6hno0c6
> [3] K8s Zoom Guidelines:
> https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/communication/zoom-guidelines.md
> [4] K8s Moderation Guidelines:
> https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/communication/moderation.md
> [5] Example recorded meeting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uZScaWEb08
>
> On 8/9/19, 10:27 AM, "sankalp kohli" <kohlisank...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     @Dinesh/Nate: Yes we need to decide on the timing and we can always
> change
>     them as we go
>     @Joshua/Gary: We will publish notes on the mailing list. If we need to
> make
>     a decision, we will still need to get it voted on the ML. We should not
>     have a case where someone misses the boat because they could not
> attend one
>     of these. So ML is a big part of this.
>
>     Additional feedback welcome.
>
>     On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:28 AM Gary Dusbabek <gdusba...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>     > Would publishing notes to the ML be sufficient? Apache board
> meetings work
>     > this way.
>     >
>     > Gary.
>     >
>     > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 4:51 PM Nate McCall <zznat...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>     >
>     > > We can do the time mostly fair if we alternate back and forth
> between PST
>     > > morning and evening. This will at least let most folks attend
> every other
>     > > meeting.
>     > >
>     > > I agree with Josh's sentiment on the discussions. We can do it, we
> just
>     > > have to be aware of it and defer things to Jira and/or ML.
>     > >
>     > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 12:42 AM Joshua McKenzie <
> jmcken...@apache.org>
>     > > wrote:
>     > >
>     > > > The one thing we need to keep in mind is the "If it didn't
> happen on a
>     > > > mailing list, it didn't happen <http://theapacheway.com/on-list/
> >"
>     > > > philosophy of apache projects. Shouldn't constrain us too much
> as the
>     > > > nuance is:
>     > > >
>     > > > *"Discussions and plan proposals often happen at events, in chats
>     > (Slack,
>     > > > IRC, IM, etc.) or other synchronous places. But all final
> decisions
>     > about
>     > > > executing on the plan, checking in the new code, or launching the
>     > website
>     > > > must be made by the community asyncrhonously on the mailing
> list."*
>     > > >
>     > > > So long as we keep that in mind (and maybe push it back to 8am
> PST
>     > since
>     > > > 9am can get pretty ugly for some of the more eastern european /
> asian
>     > > > countries), makes sense to me.
>     > > >
>     > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:07 PM Dinesh Joshi <djo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>     > > >
>     > > > > Thanks for initiating this conversation Sankalp. On the ASF
> front, I
>     > > > think
>     > > > > we need to ensure that non-Pacific time participants can also
>     > > participate
>     > > > > in the discussions. So posting the notes and opening up
> discussions
>     > > after
>     > > > > the meet up to dev@ would be a great way of making sure
> everyone can
>     > > > > participate and gets visibility. Additionally, we should
> consider
>     > > > > scheduling this meetup in different timezones as far as
> logistics
>     > allow
>     > > > it.
>     > > > >
>     > > > > Dinesh
>     > > > >
>     > > > > > On Aug 6, 2019, at 2:58 PM, sankalp kohli <
> kohlisank...@gmail.com>
>     > > > > wrote:
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > Hi All,
>     > > > > >         There are projects (like k8s[1]) which do regular
> meetings
>     > > > using
>     > > > > > video conferencing tools. We want to propose such a meeting
> for
>     > > Apache
>     > > > > > Cassandra once a quarter. Here are some of the initial
> details.
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > 1. A two hour meeting once a quarter starting at 9am
> Pacific. We
>     > can
>     > > > > later
>     > > > > > move this to other times to make it easier for other
> timezones.
>     > > > > > 2. Agenda of the meeting will be due 2 days prior to the
> meeting. A
>     > > > > sample
>     > > > > > agenda for next one could cover updates on 4.0 testing, any
> major
>     > > bugs
>     > > > > > found and/or fixed, next steps for 4.0, etc.
>     > > > > > 3. Each agenda item will have a time duration and list of
> people to
>     > > > drive
>     > > > > > that item.
>     > > > > > 4. We will have a moderator for each meeting which will
> rotate
>     > around
>     > > > the
>     > > > > > community members.
>     > > > > > 5. We need to figure out which video conferencing tool to
> use for
>     > > this.
>     > > > > > Suggestions and donation of tools are welcome.
>     > > > > > 6. We will have meeting notes for each item discussed in the
>     > meeting.
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > Motivation for such a meeting
>     > > > > > 1. We currently have Slack, JIRA and emails however an agenda
>     > driven
>     > > > > video
>     > > > > > meeting can help facilitate alignment within the community.
>     > > > > > 2. This will give an opportunity to the community to
> summarize past
>     > > > > > progress and talk about future tasks.
>     > > > > > 3. Agenda notes can serve as newsletters for the community.
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > Notes:
>     > > > > > 1. Does this violate any Apache rules? I could not find any
> rules
>     > but
>     > > > > > someone can double check
>     > > > > > 2. Are there any other Apache projects which do something
> similar?
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > This is a proposal at this time and your feedback is greatly
>     > > > appreciated.
>     > > > > > If anyone thinks this will not help then please provide a
> reason.
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > Thanks,
>     > > > > > Sankalp
>     > > > > > [1]
>     > https://github.com/kubernetes/community/tree/master/sig-storage
>     > > > >
>     > > > >
>     > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
>     > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
>     > > > >
>     > > > >
>     > > >
>     > >
>     >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to