> As for precedent - we (including me) have done a lot of stupid shit over the > years on this project. Half the time “this is how we’ve historically done X” > to me is a strong argument to start doing things differently. This is one > such case.
+1. I definitely agree that this is one area of precedent that we should not be following. The project has historically been fairly hostile towards longer upgrade timelines, I am glad to see all the recent conversations where this seems to be improving. -Jeremiah
