Re: Cocoon Forms namespaces (was: [SUMMARY] From Woody to Cocoon Forms 1.0)

[Stefano Mazzocchi]

Reinhard Pötz wrote:

Marc Portier wrote:

Reinhard Pötz wrote:

Vadim Gritsenko wrote:

Reinhard Pötz wrote:

Tim Larson wrote:

+1 'cforms' instead of just 'forms'

I'm +1 for "forms" only - as Vadim pointed out, it's "Cocoon" is obvious because it's within the Cocoon CVS.
WDOT?

Ok, we (where we stands for Vadim, Tim, Bertrand, and Rolf) had a little chat on IRC and agreed on the following:

  Block Title: Cocoon Forms, or Cocoon Forms 1.0
  Block Name: cforms
  Package: org.apache.cocoon.cforms
  Namespace: http://apache.org/cocoon/forms/definition/1.0

sorry for missing the argumentation on keeping the 'forms' here, or is this a typo?

NS Prefix: fd

and similar for binding and templating I presume? we might question if reordering the sub-domain and version-no is not more natural then:

xmlns:fd=http://apache.org/cocoon/cforms/1.0/definition
xmlns:fb=http://apache.org/cocoon/cforms/1.0/binding

I like it, but I'm no specialist on those things.
Stefano, IIRC you did some research on namespaces for Cocoon Blocks, WDYT?

I would do

http://apache.org/cocoon/cforms/1.0#definition

so that in the future there is an algorithmical way to get to the version.

--
Stefano.

smime.p7s

Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature