Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Ugo Cei wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Should we interpret this as a veto?
It's not up to interpretation, as nobody can veto [VOTE]s.
Vetos can only be used to revert commits that should not happen because of problems they generate, and be accompanied with solid technical reasons.
Thank you for the clarification. I did look around for an exhaustive and unambiguous description of our voting procedures, but couldn't find any. Do you have any pointers?
http://incubator.apache.org/learn/voting.html
Hmmm...
"Under normal (non-lazy consensus) conditions, the proposal requires three positive votes and no negative ones in order to pass; [...]
For code-modification votes, +1 votes are in favour of the proposal, but -1 votes are vetos and kill the proposal dead until all vetoers withdraw their -1 votes."
Doesn't this apply to this vote?
I knew you would ask ;-)
These rules are the ones that came out of HTTPD land, and reflect a codebase that changes very differently from ours. What you should really be looking at is: http://xml.apache.org/decisions.html
We should have our own voting guidelines... where are they?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------