Carsten Ziegeler dijo:
>
> Joerg Heinicke wrote:
>> >
>> > Guess cocoon.continuation is the preferred way.
>>
>> The JXTemplateGenerator suggest to use ${continuation.id},
>> nothing about the cocoon prefix. Maybe we should ask
>> Christopher what his plan was. Or we simply decide it here.
>>
> The old way "continuation.id" has been deprecated. The correct way
> should be "cocoon.*" to use the same syntax as in flow script.
> So whereever just "continuation.id" is documented, this has to be
> fixed.Why? It cannot be a fixed variable? In Rhino we borrow the "continuation" from scheme language. That is the cause why we use it directly and not with with a "cocoon" prefix. My fault, I don't saw when we changed our mind to use "cocoon.continuation". :-( Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
