Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > >>Reinhard Poetz a écrit : > >> > >>>Tony Collen wrote: > >>> > >>>>...Let's deprecate the PHP block for the remainder of our 2.1.X > >>>>releases and then dump it in 2.2. If people want to "use" PHP with > >>>>Cocoon, the best solution is to just use a FileGenerator and an > >>>>http:// URL... > >>> > >>>+1 too. Could you set up a formal vote which is needed to change the > >>>status of the PHP block? > >> > >>+1, I agree with the formal vote but if you start it by counting all > >>the +1s here we don't need to vote again. > > > > > > One trouble is that Cocoon does not yet have any > > project guidelines. Another trouble is that people > > seem to use the +1 thing even when a vote is not > > happening. The proposal phase for the discussion, > > then the vote phase for the decision, is an Apache > > way to get things done efficiently. We forget that. > > Please, don't get over-bureaucratic. We've got governments for this (and yes, > this CMM thingy as well).
No, it is not bureaucratic. It is about efficiency. -- David Crossley
