Upayavira wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Hi,
I've just run Forrest and have uploaded the site to:
http://www.apache.org/~upayavira/site/
Can you take a look, and make sure I've run the Forrest process
correctly?
If this looks okay (I'm aware of a couple of details, e.g. jimi),
I'll make some changes (e.g. CVS->SVN, 2.1.6->news, etc), then try to
complete the publication process.
As a newbie to this, I'd appreciate confirmation that what I've done
so far is okay.
TIA.
Upayavira
The news doesn't show the release of 2.1.6 and the changes page
doesn't look current.
Okay. My request was more to do with "have I run Forrest right". I
should have made that more clear.
There are two aspects.
* The person who ran the 'forrest' command
would have seen the "Build Successful" note.
* Any of us can review Upayavira's staging site
to see if it "looks okay".
For the latter, i just glanced at a few pages
and it seems to be fine. I see from the dates
in the footers, that you updated both the
"top-level" site docs and the "2.1" docs ... good.
--David
As to news - I'll add that. As to changes, I'll have to update my
checkout of 2.1.X before publishing the site. In fact, I'll do that now,
lest I forget...
Thanks for reviewing.
Upayavira
