Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: > > IMO, OSGi seem to be the best choice for kernel for Cocoon's block > architecture and there is (if I haven't missed something important) a > low risk, incremental and evolutionary way to get there. > Hmm, I'm currently not sure if we really need such an infrastructure for our own blocks; it seems like a big burden and might make things more complicated than they could be. Don't know. I still have the problem that I can't see what real world problems will be solved with this and what the drawbacks are. Sure, it sounds cool...
Ok, anyways, I will not block any approach, I'm just trying to express my current feelings about it. But I really thing whatever we do, this should *not* be done in the current trunk. We should move 2.2 out the door as soon as possible and target "real blocks" for a later release. So, try out OSGi if you want, but please not in the trunk. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
