Youch, i presumed that when we moved to Jira that the old Bugzilla would be closed and people would need to look for our issues.apache.org/jira
This old issue was able to be re-opened and commented. -David On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:41:43AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG? > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36810>. > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND? > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36810 > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-31 08:41 ------- > I'm not sure what the bug is in Forest, but I doubt it depends on #32360. > JXPath > was working correctly (at least until it was broken while someone mistakenly > "fixed" 32360). There might be some problem in how Forest's XPath expressions > are designed to handle the default namespace, or it might be something > completely different.
