> From: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Selling to management another > > migration project before 2008 would be very hard, especially since > > the current 2.2 has new feature really interesting to us. > > Something is wrong with that sentence I guess. I miss the logic: You > can't sell another migration, because the version potentially > migrated to has interesting features? Oops, missing negation. *no* new feature really interesting to *us*. > Isn't it just wording? It has always been the case that the > old branch has not been closed. If there is any interest in > applying an enhancement to an old branch, just do it. Nobody will > prevent you from doing it. But you simply can't expect from every > committer to also do the back porting. So any maintenance of the > older branch is up to the individual one still having interest in > it. At the end interest will simply decrease and the branch will > be going to sleep - as it happened with 2.0.x. Yes, it's all about wording. Let 2.1.x go to sleep but don't kill it. Cheers, Alfred. This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company.
