I'd also vote +1 on retiring 3.0. There's only little activity overall I'd opt for concentrating it instead of fuchsig on too many things in parallel.
Chris Gesendet von Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> ________________________________ From: Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 6:45:42 PM To: dev@cocoon.apache.org <dev@cocoon.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Retiring 3.0 ? (Was: Re: Future of the Cocoon project) On 01/12/23 18:24, Cédric Damioli wrote: > Le 01/12/2023 à 17:41, Cédric Damioli a écrit : >> We'd like to know whether you'd prefer: >> [ ] retiring Cocoon 3.0 >> [ ] reviving/maintaining Cocoon 3.0, meaning that you volunteer to be >> somehow involved > > I'd vote +1 for retiring Cocoon 3.0, as during the past 10+ years, I had seen > no thread, no questions about it. > I personally have never tried it. Cocoon 3.0 has been my first "serious" approach to The ASF and also where I earned committership and PMC membership. I am not pleased to admin that, but I think it is time to let it go: while its ground ideas were incredibly neat at the time, they never turned into mainstream, regrettably. It has been even used by Syncope until 3.0.0-M0 [1] around Q4 2022. Regards. [1] https://github.com/apache/syncope/blob/syncope-3.0.0-M0/pom.xml#L1167-L1176 -- Francesco Chicchiriccò Tirasa - Open Source Excellence http://www.tirasa.net/ Member at The Apache Software Foundation Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
