Hello.
> >Should we simply allow user to register an instance of some optimizer
> reconfigurator interface in the constructor ? Something like:
> >
> > public MultiStartDifferentiableMultivariateVectorialOptimizer(
> > DifferentiableMultivariateVectorialOptimizer optimizer,
> > int starts,
> > RandomVectorGenerator generator,
> > OptimizerReconfigurator reconfigurator)
>
> >with
>
> >public interface OptimizerReconfigurator {
> > public DifferentiableMultivariateVectorialOptimizer
> > reconfigure(DifferentiableMultivariateVectorialOptimizer);
> >}
>
> +1 from me.
> Question is how reconfigure() is configured?
> In the CMA-ES case this would mean how the population increase factor
> Is defined. May be simply by an additional parameter for the
> optimization algo?
"reconfigure" returns the _new_ optimizer instance that will be used for the
next start.
However, can we slow down on the new features? (Am I saying this? ;-))
[We previously agreed that the main algorithm code should be put in place
before any other bells and whistles.]
Best regards,
Gilles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
