Hello. > > [...] > > > > The idea is to have "interleaved" calls to the candidate > > implementations, so > > that (hopefully) they will be penalized (or benefit) in the same way > > by what > > the JVM is doing (GC or JIT compilation or ...) while the benchmark > > is > > running. > > > > Does this make sense? > > Could it be merged by the FastMath performance tests Sebb set up ?
I don't think so. If you meant rewriting the "FastMathTestPerformance" tests using the proposed utility, I don't think that it is necessary. If you meant something else, I didn't get it. :-} Best, Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
