On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 08:26:54AM +0100, Sébastien Brisard wrote: > Hi Gilles, > > I cannot reproduce these failures either. Here is my config > Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 21:16:01+0200) > Java version: 1.7.0_05 > Java home: /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_05/jre > Default locale: fr_FR, platform encoding: UTF-8 > OS name: "linux" version: "3.6.9-2.fc17.x86_64" arch: "amd64" Family: "unix"
Thanks Sébastien. So, what can we conclude concerning the failure reported by Oliver? Gilles > Sébastien > > > 2012/12/20 Gilles Sadowski <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:13:36AM +0100, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:14:58PM +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > > > > Le 19/12/2012 22:04, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Luc Maisonobe < > > luc.maison...@free.fr>wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Le 19/12/2012 11:03, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > > > > >>> Hi. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Please have a look at the latest candidate (RC4), and vote for the > > > > >> release > > > > >>> of Commons Math 3.1. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> ---------- > > > > >>> Tag: > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_1_RC4/ > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Site: > > > > >>> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.1/RC4/ > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Binaries: > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-048/org/apache/commons/commons-math3/3.1/ > > > > >>> > > > > >>> [X] +1 Release it. > > > > >> > > > > >> There are a few missing headers, but only in test files, so I don't > > > > >> think it is a blocker. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I'm not so sure, missing headers on .java are a must IMO. > > > > > > > > I have fixed them in trunk, as well as a few checkstyle errors I missed > > > > earlier. > > > > > > The CheckStyle warnings were probably a consequence of fixing the Clirr > > > errors. > > > > > > Do we stand with your previous statement that missing headers on test > > files > > > were not a blocker? IIRC, this was the conclusion for release 3.0. Those > > > headers have been missing for a long time. The JIRA report will avoid > > that > > > for next time. > > > > Well, last time, the Java files were indeed corrected to contain a license > > header. [The data files were deemed OK without it.] > > > > I'll create a new tag. > > > > Can someone check the problems found by Oliver on M$-Windows? > > > > > > Gilles > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
