I have create BEANUTILS-432 [1] for this. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-432
2013/3/6 Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> > Am 06.03.2013 13:35, schrieb sebb: > > On 6 March 2013 11:32, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have recently learned that changing the required Java version for a >>> component does not necessarily affect binary compartibility [1]. >>> I'm thinking about updating [BeanUtils] to Java 1.5. We would have the >>> following advantages: >>> >>> - concurrency facilities in java.util.concurrent (could be useful for the >>> internal caching) >>> - generics >>> - JUnit 4 >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >> >> +1 >> > > +1 from me, too. It really felt strange when creating patches to adhere to > Java 1.3 restrictions. > > Oliver > > > >> Benedikt >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> http://markmail.org/message/**mgsjqib5iyyaicgg<http://markmail.org/message/mgsjqib5iyyaicgg> >>> -- >>> http://people.apache.org/~**britter/<http://people.apache.org/~britter/> >>> http://www.systemoutprintln.**de/ <http://www.systemoutprintln.de/> >>> http://twitter.com/**BenediktRitter <http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter> >>> http://github.com/britter >>> >> >> ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- http://people.apache.org/~britter/ http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter http://github.com/britter
