On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/27/13 12:03 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > > On 03/26/2013 11:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> On 3/25/13 8:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > >>>> On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM, Gilles wrote: > >>>>> Hello. > >>>>> > >>>>>> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. > >>>>>> Any thoughts about it? > >>>>> How soon? > >>>>> There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2. > >>>>> There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936). > >>>>> There is at least one contribution requiring some feedback > (MATH-917). > >>>> I have added a first patch and would love to get some feedback. > >>> It seems we are really close to releasing now. I guess MATH-817 will be > >>> resolved soon. What seems to be achievable in a short time frame would > be: > >>> > >>> - wrapping up MATH-917 as Thomas proposed, > >>> - finishing MATH-437 (Kolmogorov-Smirnov), and perhaps also > >>> MATH-228 at the same time > >> See comment just added to MATH-437. I am working on it, but not > >> ready to commit to API, so say bump this to 3.3/4.0. > >> > >> One thing I did not mention in the MATH-437 comment. While I think > >> we should not do it in the K-S case, because the dist itself has > >> little value and much numeric instability, the approximation tricks > >> in your patch are interesting and might merit inclusion in > >> AbstractRealDistribution (which actually is where the impls belong). > > Hi Phil, > > > > can you maybe also take a look at MATH-981? I have already provided a > > patch, but would like to hear your opinion on this as it is more a > > work-around for the moment. > > Hmmm. Can't find 981 and no permutation looks that interesting ;) > sorry, its MATH-891 Thomas
