On 16 May 2013 18:25, Dave Brosius <dbros...@mebigfatguy.com> wrote: > or ByteArrayInput/OutputStream > > > On 05/16/2013 01:13 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> >> sebb wrote: >> >>> The issue >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-330 >>> >>> added 4 methods: >>> public static BufferedXXXX asBufferedXXXX(final XXXX xxxx) >>> where XXXX = InputStream, OutputStream, Reader, Writer >>> >>> I just noticed that >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-233 >>> suggests overloaded methods called buffer instead: >>> >>> public static BufferedXXXX buffer(final XXXX xxxx) >>> >>> This is quite a lot easier to type, so I propose to rename the methods >>> (and link the JIRAs) unless there are objections. >> >> +1 >> >> However, I'd wrap the provided stream/reader/writer only, if it is not >> already a (derived) buffered implementation.
That's what the asBufferedXXXX methods already do - they buffer the IO channel if not already buffered. >> Cheers, >> Jörg >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
