+1

2013/8/1 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> Do we want to keep cxf module?
>
> IMO it can be replaced by a monitoring filter (web module)
>
> wdyt?
>
> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>
>
>
> 2013/7/31 Luc Maisonobe <luc.maison...@free.fr>
>
>> Le 28/07/2013 18:30, Mark Struberg a écrit :
>> > Hi folks!
>> >
>> > Romain is a great guy, I've now added him to commons-sandbox.
>>
>> Thanks Mark.
>>
>> I am really sorry for the delay. I have just read today the mail
>> Benedikt sent me 5 days ago :-(
>>
>> sorry
>> Luc
>>
>> >
>> > LieGrue,
>> > strub
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
>> > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
>> > Cc:
>> > Sent: Saturday, 27 July 2013, 3:46
>> > Subject: Re: commons-monitoring?
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Well we can discuss it in another thread but basically commons spirit
>> for
>> >> me is more basic and shouldn't be a facade (excepted logging). So i'd
>> >> rather see proxy as an implementation of proxying using asm efficiently.
>> >> The issue with proxying is not its lifecycle or API in general but its
>> >> specificities (cache, proxy names, handlers...). The best solution IMO
>> is
>> >> to propose a unified solution which could be a facade but facade means
>> all
>> >> impl specificities in its API which makes it harder or specific (in v1
>> >> instantiating the factory was a pain IMO since it is specific). ATM the
>> >> question for me is always which one do i import depending my container,
>> do
>> >> i test against all proxies impl? Etc... it makes libs hard to write and
>> >> maintain
>> >
>> > Great feedback!  Please start another thread so we can discuss.
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>



-- 
Olivier Lamy
Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to