On 19.10. I wrote a mail in response to Henri Yandell. http://markmail.org/message/c63kqyipuy6islib
I would like to follow up on the issues i mentioned there.Our dormant components are unmaintained and our dormant websites are broken.
Therefore I would like to remove the websites. In example we are having this critical and wellknown security problem: http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/225657 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpujun2013-1899847.html At all these pages: http://commons.apache.org/dormant/cache/apidocs/index.html http://commons.apache.org/dormant/contract/apidocs/index.html http://commons.apache.org/dormant/convert/apidocs/index.html http://commons.apache.org/dormant/events/apidocs/index.html http://commons.apache.org/dormant/feedparser/apidocs/index.html http://commons.apache.org/dormant/jjar/apidocs/index.html http://commons.apache.org/dormant/latka/apidocs/index.html http://commons.apache.org/dormant/mapper/apidocs/index.html http://commons.apache.org/dormant/messenger/apidocs/index.html http://commons.apache.org/dormant/resources/apidocs/index.html http://commons.apache.org/dormant/scaffold/apidocs/index.html http://commons.apache.org/dormant/threadpool/apidocs/index.html http://commons.apache.org/dormant/workflow/apidocs/index.html http://commons.apache.org/dormant/xmlio/apidocs/index.htmlIn addition none of the dormant components are respecting the trademark branding guidelines:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html If there is nobody who wants to fix these within a short timeframe I believe we should remove the websites from our server and forwarding it to maybe a wiki page which explains that docs of dormant components can only be retrieved by checking out the source code. Cheers, Christian --- http://www.grobmeier.de @grobmeier GPG: 0xA5CC90DB --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
